October 14, 2010 by Jeff Hurt
Image by Tobias Leeger.
Armed with creativity, passion, $150, friends and YouTube, Dave Carroll created more than nine million impressions.
You’ve probably heard of Carroll. He wrote and created the music video “United Breaks Guitars” about United’s baggage handlers smashing the base of his $3,500 Taylor guitar. United refused to pay $1,200 to repair his guitar because of an archaic policy. Carroll got even.
Carroll responded by uploading his music video to YouTube. Within the first 24 hours, 25,000 people viewed it. Then it went viral. Since then, Carroll has had more than 250 media interviews. He has appeared on CNN, The View and several other national TV shows, And his website gets more than 50,000 hits a day.
And what happened to United? Positive sentiment in social media networks decreased from 34% to 28%. Negative sentiment increased from 22% to 25%. Positive stories in traditional media dropped from 39% to 27% while negative stories increased from 18% to 23%. (data from Syomos) Six months after the story broke, United PR continues to receive requests to talk about the incident.
Traditional marketing broadcasts messages to masses of people. Marketers count the number of impressions people receive. One ad campaign might create seven million impressions. And the costs of that one ad campaign can be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Carroll had more than seven million impressions on a budget of $150. What’s your marketing and advertising budget?
Which online impressions do you think people give more attention? Does your marketing and advertising strategy reflect the power of individual influencers? Have you considered the positive or negative effect of Word of Mouth (WOM) influence?
Empowered authors Josh Bernoff and Ted Schadler identify a four step strategy to connect with empowered individuals that have great online influence. IDEA: Identify, Deliver, Empower, Amplify.
Focus on people that are most likely to spread your organization’s message. Where do you find these mass influencers?
Connect with and serve those influencers. Leave comments on their blogs, Facebook page and other social networks. Build a relationship with them. Participate in their Twitter chats. Highlight and recommend them to others and they’ll be likely to reciprocate.
Provide extra and sometimes exclusive information that they can share with their followers and friends.
Find the individuals that already love you. Boost the affect they have on their friends and followers.
Marketers must begin to develop a plan for WOM and individual influencers. They need to think of mass influencers as a marketing channel. It’s a new way to think about marketing, service and customers.
What’s keeping your from connecting with online influencers? What’s the best way to connect with an online influencer?
* Impressions data from Forrester’s North American Tehnographics Empowerment Online Survey Q4 2009 of 10,000 people
Filed Under: Attendance Marketing
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff Hurt and Dave Lutz, Zerista Pro. Zerista Pro said: RT: Identifying Influencers: Harnessing The Power Of Individuals: Image by Tobias Leeger. Armed… http://bit.ly/bbu9Vt #eventprofs […]
Jeff, great list.. enjoying the panel. Another tool you should take a look at (yes, shilling :-)) is PostRank.
Take a look at the metrics around your content:
You can hover over the scores to preview the metrics, and for more in-depth data.. there is postrank analytics as well @ analytics.postrank.com.
‘@Ilya Thanks for attending, reading and commenting. Glad you added postrank. I completely forgot about them.
What this also speaks to is people who have “true passion”. When you find them, you will always know it practically oozes from their pores! It speaks volumes on viral messaging, marketing and the value it has at no cost to the customer~!
If you don’t mind me disagreeing….
You mention the 256 billion impressions of Forrester, where you should discount all the tweets, blogs posts, reviews and facebook posts that nobody read, or nobody paid attention to. After that you are left with a tiny percentage, which is fine, but then the real question is how do we tell the influential ones.
To that question you say we should use Klout, Social Mention, Boardreader, Google blogs. While Klout is a good metric for reach and engagement (not influence) the others are if anything mere search engines with no insight beyond, perhaps, popularity.
You seem to be implying that anyone with a blog or creating content is an influencer….
Not my style at all going about slugging off blog posts but there is a lot we don’t know about social influence in digital media and this simplistic approaches don’t makes us any favour.
Thanks for adding your perspective. It is a good one too!
Your comment about impressions is right on target. It is the same thing for a digital, print, radio or TV advertisement. Impressions are the language of marketing professionals and just because an ad (or post) was displayed, doesn’t mean that people paid attention to it. It is a way for marketers to understand the potential of social networks and social technologies using their common venacular.
I also agree with you that the tools I listed all have their pros and cons and help you find people that appear to have some influence. I wrote this post for a workshop I did at BlogWorld 2010 where there was much more discussion about numbers, followers, readers, reach, etc. Numbers don’t always equal influence.
Consider Dave Carroll for a moment. He would not have been identified as someone with influence. He was relatively unknown. So influencers can actually come from anywhere.
I do think that metrics about blogs (views, subscribers, comments, RTs) will help organizers identify if the writer has some influence.
Thank you for creating some depth to this blog post. I appreciate it and am glad you took the time to add your feedback.
Thanks for recommenting. I submited the comment and though you would hate me! 🙂
You got me with the impressions. They are potential sources of influence just as Tv and we do measure TV on that respect, ar least as a good start. However, there is a little difference between earned ( usually trusted ) and paid ( usually untrusted ) media that we cannot forget. To that respect, we should start considering more “trust metrics” and less reach metrics, all of them falsely attributed as influence metrics ( take klout ).
However, There is a big correlation between reach and influence, at various levels and cases. Spot on we have to look at those. But there is a strong tendency in the industry towards ignoring the product strategy and to assume that reach is good in all cases. And not consider trust or attributed expertise, which is what leads to influence.
I think studying influence in digital media is still in its infancy.
I just started, but consider following @digiinfluentia and let’s be in touch
BTW, I invite dissenting thought and opinion. That’s healthy and a good way to provide open dialogue. I love your thoughts about trust metrics too.
I will have a think about “trust metrics” they are probably floating around already ( does a RT show trust? ).
Food for thought, many thanks, I think the comments have added a new interesting layer to the post so thanks for allowing dissidence 🙂
[…] Identifying Influencers: Harnessing the Power of Individuals by Jeff Hurt […]
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *